Search Results

Buy
View: 250 | All
Your search yielded 158 images
Refine Search (click to open)
Keywords:
Match all words
Match any word
City:
State (US):
Country:
Model Released:
Property Released:
Orientation:
Pricing Type:
Prints
Personal Use
Royalty-Free
Rights-Managed
(leave unchecked to
 search all images)
Sort By:
  • A sign of what is in the national scene regarding immigration and illegal entry.  Acting as a proxy for the concern of many citizens over the influx of illegals, and as an ironic statement of turnabout being fair play, at the intersection of Texas and San Jacinto Street in Houston, Texas, one finds a battery of Spanish language newspapers, some published by the Houston Chronicle.

  • A sign of what is in the national scene regarding immigration and illegal entry.  Acting as a proxy for the concern of many citizens over the influx of illegals, and as an ironic statement of turnabout being fair play, at the intersection of Texas and San Jacinto Street in Houston, Texas, one finds a battery of Spanish language newspapers, some published by the Houston Chronicle.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas.  Most Rev. Joseph A. Fiorenza Archbishop Emeritus of Galveston-Houston arrives at a function styled as "Unaccompanied Children on the Border: vulnerability, Migration, and the Legal System", where citizens exercising their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church  - and the willingness of the Church to allow such insertion. Additionally, they are appalled at the insertion of the Church into the affairs of The State - and the apparent willingness of The State to allow such insertion into its affairs.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas.  Most Rev. Joseph A. Fiorenza Archbishop Emeritus of Galveston-Houston arrives at a function styled as "Unaccompanied Children on the Border: vulnerability, Migration, and the Legal System", where citizens exercising their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church  - and the willingness of the Church to allow such insertion.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas.  Most Rev. Joseph A. Fiorenza Archbishop Emeritus of Galveston-Houston stops to discuss things with  citizens exercising their 1st Ammendment rights at an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church  - and the willingness of the Church to allow such insertion.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas.  Most Rev. Joseph A. Fiorenza Archbishop Emeritus of Galveston-Houston after stopping to discuss things with  citizens exercising their 1st Ammendment rights at an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church  - and the willingness of the Church to allow such insertion.Additionally, they are appalled at the insertion of the Church into the affairs of The State - and the apparent willingness of The State to allow such insertion into its affairs.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas.  Most Rev. Joseph A. Fiorenza Archbishop Emeritus of Galveston-Houston stops to discuss things with  citizens exercising their 1st Ammendment rights at an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church  - and the willingness of the Church to allow such insertion.Additionally, they are appalled at the insertion of the Church into the affairs of The State - and the apparent willingness of The State to allow such insertion into its affairs.

  • Houston, Texas - People on the margins of society who will be further marginalized if limited resources get diverted to assist illegal entrants drawn to the United States due to inconsistent and loose immigration enforcement policy that encourages illegal border crossing.

  • Surrounded by shadows of others on the margins of society, a man paces in the courtyard of a shelter, while down the street, citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old)  to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104,  an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare orproxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
 <br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. A participant, after  blowing on a shofar( ram's horn), exhorts listeners to hear the words at an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. As law enfrocement look on, citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, and call attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Holding an American flag as symbol for what is held dear, one citizen participant in an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, those participating  are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States, as well as the issue of the burden that the Federal Government will be by inference placing on State Courts to engage in judicial findings determinations and processing actions associated with Federal residence status determinations.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. As law enfrocement look on, citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, and call attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, and call attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • Surrounded by shadows of others on the margins of society, a man paces in the courtyard of a shelter, while down the street, citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old)  to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104,  an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in 2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare or proxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
 <br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • Houston, Texas - People on the margins of society who will be further marginalized if limited resources get diverted to assist illegal entrants drawn to the United States due to inconsistent and loose immigration enforcement policy that encourages illegal border crossing.

  • Surrounded by shadows of others on the margins of society, a man paces in the courtyard of a shelter, while down the street, citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old)  to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104,  an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare orproxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
 <br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. A participant, after  blowing on a shofar( ram's horn), exhorts listeners to hear the words at an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. While a citizen stops to discuss matters with one of the event organizers, a participant blowing on a shofar( ram's horn) exhorts listeners to hear the words at an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. A participant, after  blowing on a shofar( ram's horn), exhorts listeners to hear the words at an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. A participant, after  blowing on a shofar( ram's horn), exhorts listeners to hear the words at an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. While a citizen stops to discuss matters with one of the event organizers, a participant blowing on a shofar( ram's horn) exhorts listeners to hear the words at an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. While a citizen stops to discuss matters with one of the event organizers, a participant blowing on a shofar( ram's horn) exhorts listeners to hear the words at an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. While a citizen stops to discuss matters with one of the event organizers, a participant blowing on a shofar( ram's horn) exhorts listeners to hear the words at an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church.

  • Surrounded by shadows of others on the margins of society, a man paces in the courtyard of a shelter, while down the street, citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old)  to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104,  an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare orproxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
 <br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. While a citizen stops to discuss matters with one of the event organizers, a participant blowing on a shofar( ram's horn) exhorts listeners to hear the words at an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Holding an American flag as symbol for what is held dear, one citizen participant in an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, those participating  are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States, as well as the issue of the burden that the Federal Government will be by inference placing on State Courts to engage in judicial findings determinations and processing actions associated with Federal residence status determinations.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. While a citizen stops to discuss matters with one of the event organizers, a participant blowing on a shofar( ram's horn) exhorts listeners to hear the words at an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. One citizen participating in an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular they are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Holding an American flag as symbol for what is held dear, one citizen participant in an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, those participating  are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States, as well as the issue of the burden that the Federal Government will be by inference placing on State Courts to engage in judicial findings determinations and processing actions associated with Federal residence status determinations.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. One citizen participating in an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular they are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. One citizen participating in an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular they are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Fellow citizens take note as others exercise their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular they are concened with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abbetting of illegal entrants to the United States.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Fellow citizens take note as others exercise their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular they are concened with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abbetting of illegal entrants to the United States.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular they are concened with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abbetting of illegal entrants to the United States.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. A mother with a young child discusses things with one of the citizens exercising their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity, two passers by discuss issues related to illegal entry of non-US citizens and factors associated with jobs and unemployment. The mother was in agreement and said that programs for her child were being curtailed due to issues involving illegals in the education system.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular they are concened with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abbetting of illegal entrants to the United States.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. A mother with a young child discusses things with one of the citizens exercising their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity, two passers by discuss issues related to illegal entry of non-US citizens and factors associated with jobs and unemployment. The mother was in agreement and said that programs for her child were being curtailed due to issues involving illegals in the education system.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular they are concened with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abbetting of illegal entrants to the United States.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular they are concened with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abbetting of illegal entrants to the United States.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular they are concened with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abbetting of illegal entrants to the United States.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular they are concened with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abbetting of illegal entrants to the United States.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular they are concened with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abbetting of illegal entrants to the United States.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular they are concened with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abbetting of illegal entrants to the United States.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular they are concened with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abbetting of illegal entrants to the United States.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular they are concened with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abbetting of illegal entrants to the United States.

  • Surrounded by shadows of others on the margins of society, a man paces in the courtyard of a shelter, while down the street, citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old)  to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104,  an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare orproxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
 <br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular they are concened with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abbetting of illegal entrants to the United States.

  • Surrounded by shadows of others on the margins of society, a man paces in the courtyard of a shelter, while down the street, citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old)  to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104,  an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare orproxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
 <br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • Surrounded by shadows of others on the margins of society, a man paces in the courtyard of a shelter, while down the street, citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old)  to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104,  an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare orproxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
 <br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • Surrounded by shadows of others on the margins of society, a man paces in the courtyard of a shelter, while down the street, citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old)  to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104,  an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare orproxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
 <br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • Surrounded by shadows of others on the margins of society, a man paces in the courtyard of a shelter, while down the street, citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old)  to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104,  an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare orproxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
 <br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • Surrounded by shadows of others on the margins of society, a man paces in the courtyard of a shelter, while down the street, citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old)  to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104,  an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare orproxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
 <br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. After hearing the voices of citizens exercising their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity, two passers by discuss issues related to illegal entry of non-US citizens and factors associated with jobs and unemployment.

  • Surrounded by shadows of others on the margins of society, a man paces in the courtyard of a shelter, while down the street, citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old)  to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104,  an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare orproxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
 <br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. As an onlooker participates, other citizens across the street are exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, and call attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, and call attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, and call attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, and call attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercising their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church  - and the willingness of the Church to allow such insertion.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercising their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church  - and the willingness of the Church to allow such insertion.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercising their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church  - and the willingness of the Church to allow such insertion.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercising their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church  - and the willingness of the Church to allow such insertion.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercising their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church  - and the willingness of the Church to allow such insertion.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercising their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church  - and the willingness of the Church to allow such insertion.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercising their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church  - and the willingness of the Church to allow such insertion.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercising their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church  - and the willingness of the Church to allow such insertion.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercising their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church  - and the willingness of the Church to allow such insertion.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. As local law enforcement looks on, citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity, and having agencies such as the DHHS, which seems to work at cross purposes to the CBP.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. As local law enforcement looks on, citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity, and having agencies such as the DHHS, which seems to work at cross purposes to the CBP.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. As local law enforcement looks on, citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity, and having agencies such as the DHHS, which seems to work at cross purposes to the CBP.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. As local law enforcement looks on, citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity, and having agencies such as the DHHS, with its liberal and attractant illegal entrant assistance programs, which seems to work at cross purposes to the CBP and its prevention and apprehension activities. Supporters believe that it is almost as if the government mission is to apprehend and assist.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. As local law enforcement looks on, citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity, and having agencies such as the DHHS, with its liberal and attractant illegal entrant assistance programs, which seems to work at cross purposes to the CBP and its prevention and apprehension activities. Supporters believe that it is almost as if the government mission is to apprehend and assist.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. As local law enforcement looks on, citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity, and having agencies such as the DHHS with its liberal and attractant illegal entrant assistance programs, which seems to work at cross purposes to the CBP and its prevention and apprehension activities. Supporters believe that it is almost as if the government mission is to apprehend and assist.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. As local law enforcement looks on, citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity, and having agencies such as the DHHS, which seems to work at cross purposes to the CBP.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. As local law enforcement looks on, citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity, and having agencies such as the DHHS, with its liberal and attractant illegal entrant assistance programs, which seems to work at cross purposes to the CBP and its prevention and apprehension activities. Supporters believe that it is almost as if the government mission is to apprehend and assist.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. As local law enforcement looks on, citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity, and having agencies such as the DHHS, with its liberal and attractant illegal entrant assistance programs, which seems to work at cross purposes to the CBP and its prevention and apprehension activities. Supporters believe that it is almost as if the government mission is to apprehend and assist.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • Citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old)  to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104,  an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare orproxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
 <br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • Citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old)  to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104,  an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare orproxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
 <br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. A lone flag, symbolic of what they believe in rests on the wall at the local courthouse where to exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. A lone flag, symbolic of what they believe in rests on the wall at the local courthouse where to exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • Citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old) to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104, an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare orproxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
<br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, as bystanders take notice, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Law enforcement officers, some of which may be called upon to deal with crime or other issues generated as a result of illegal entrant activity  to their jurisdiction, check the images on their cell phones of citizens exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens from stopthemagnet.com and Montgomery County Citizens Against Illegal Immigration<br />
set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • Citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old)  to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104,  an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare orproxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
 <br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • Citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old) to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104, an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare orproxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
<br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • Citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old) to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104, an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare orproxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
<br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens from stopthemagnet.com and Montgomery County Citizens Against Illegal Immigration<br />
set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens from stopthemagnet.com and Montgomery County Citizens Against Illegal Immigration<br />
set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • Citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old) to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104, an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare orproxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
<br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens set up for the days gathering meant to call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • Surrounded by shadows of others on the margins of society, a man paces in the courtyard of a shelter, while down the street, citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old)  to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104,  an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare orproxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
 <br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. While a citizen stops to discuss matters with one of the event organizers, a participant blowing on a shofar( ram's horn) exhorts listeners to hear the words at an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, the participants are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States in seeming violation of the prohibitions against insertion of The State into affairs of the Church.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Holding an American flag as symbol for what is held dear, one citizen participant in an awareness rally calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular, those participating  are concerned with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abetting of illegal entrants to the United States, as well as the issue of the burden that the Federal Government will be by inference placing on State Courts to engage in judicial findings determinations and processing actions associated with Federal residence status determinations.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Fellow citizens take note as others exercise their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular they are concened with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abbetting of illegal entrants to the United States.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular they are concened with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abbetting of illegal entrants to the United States.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment rights calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity. In particular they are concened with government grants to organizations involved in the harboring, non-reporting and abbetting of illegal entrants to the United States.

  • Surrounded by shadows of others on the margins of society, a man paces in the courtyard of a shelter, while down the street, citizens gather at the First Circuit Court of Appeals building in Houston, Texas, to sound the alarm about an expected 150-200,000 illegal juvenile entrants (less than 18 years old)  to the United States in 2015, and the seeming inability or unwillingness of the government, to effectively control the illegal incursion. Citizens argue that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting the incursion, by acting in concert with government grant funded Federal State and Local groups operating under the cover of religious charities, to utilize the provisions of State family services law , and Federal religious exemption provisions which allow churches and other faith based groups to hide illegals and further assist their continued presence in the country.<br />
<br />
They point out that year end 2104,  an estimated 65,000 juveniles (less than 18 years old) will have been detained, and that in2015 the number of illegal juvenile entrants is expected to be 150,000 - 200000, attracted to the United States by a system, which while having laws against illegal immigration, has intentional policies in place, such as sanctuary cities, and welfare orproxy welfare for all comers regardless of citizenship, that act as magnets an inducement for illegal entry.<br />
<br />
 <br />
The list of cities offering and supporting sanctuary includes Boston, Chicago, Denver, Kansas City, New York, Oakland, Portland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Seattle and Tucson. Sanctuary is already being provided in Phoenix, Tucson, Chicago and Portland.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. As law enfrocement look on, citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, and call attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-US citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. As local law enforcement looks on, citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity, and having agencies such as the DHHS, which seems to work at cross purposes to the CBP.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. As local law enforcement looks on, citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity, and having agencies such as the DHHS, which seems to work at cross purposes to the CBP.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. As local law enforcement looks on, citizens exercise their 1st Ammendment Rights, calling attention the hypocrisy of having strict laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity, and having agencies such as the DHHS, which seems to work at cross purposes to the CBP.









  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • First Circuit Court of Appeals, Houston Texas. Exercising their 1st Ammendment Rights, citizens call attention the hypocrisy of having strict immigration laws concerning illegal entry and deportation of non-citizens to the United States, but then having government and social policies that attract that very illegal activity.

  • Austin, Texas ~ Texas Muslim Day<br />
<br />
“I love the knuckleheads,” said CAIR-TX’s executive director, Mustafaa Carroll of Houston. “In fact, I want to thank them publicly for being here, because they help you guys (reporters) get here. So they’re helping us. We want our children to see what’s going on in this world. We want our community to see.”<br />
<br />
http://www.mystatesman.com/news/news/state-regional-govt-politics/protesters-disrupt-rally-at-capitol-by-muslims-sup/njzNM/?ecmp=statesman_social_facebook_2014_sfp#5bc68b30.3581740.735627<br />
<br />
(Not reported in any story of note is that his remark was in response to a leading question  by the male reporter in the images who first used the "knucklehead" pejorative - this photographer hearing the question and being astounded at such a striking display of media bias and journalistic non-integrity.<br />
<br />
The citizens to whom the speaker was so pejoratively referring are those, who in their own way, are trying to sound the alarm about what many consider to be a creeping infiltration into the United States of,  not a religion as Westerners think of religion (as being separate form the machinery of the State), but as foreign political system wrapped up in a cloak of religion ( or vice versa).<br />
<br />
They feel that such amalgamation is antithetical to the political structure of the United States and is a and  a clear and present danger to the US Political Compact.  Indeed, they feel Islam, in its wrapping of political and religious in one entity, it is in contradiction to one of the principles apparent in the history of the creation of the United States, which is stands on the proposition and implementation of a system of separation of Church and State that the Founders knew very well lead to destruction of Nations in which the Church and the State were one.

  • Austin, Texas ~ Texas Muslim Day<br />
<br />
“I love the knuckleheads,” said CAIR-TX’s executive director, Mustafaa Carroll of Houston. “In fact, I want to thank them publicly for being here, because they help you guys (reporters) get here. So they’re helping us. We want our children to see what’s going on in this world. We want our community to see.”<br />
<br />
http://www.mystatesman.com/news/news/state-regional-govt-politics/protesters-disrupt-rally-at-capitol-by-muslims-sup/njzNM/?ecmp=statesman_social_facebook_2014_sfp#5bc68b30.3581740.735627<br />
<br />
(Not reported in any story of note is that his remark was in response to a leading question  by the male reporter in the images who first used the "knucklehead" pejorative - this photographer hearing the question and being astounded at such a striking display of media bias and journalistic non-integrity.<br />
<br />
The citizens to whom the speaker was so pejoratively referring are those, who in their own way, are trying to sound the alarm about what many consider to be a creeping infiltration into the United States of,  not a religion as Westerners think of religion (as being separate form the machinery of the State), but as foreign political system wrapped up in a cloak of religion ( or vice versa).<br />
<br />
They feel that such amalgamation is antithetical to the political structure of the United States and is a and  a clear and present danger to the US Political Compact.  Indeed, they feel Islam, in its wrapping of political and religious in one entity, it is in contradiction to one of the principles apparent in the history of the creation of the United States, which is stands on the proposition and implementation of a system of separation of Church and State that the Founders knew very well lead to destruction of Nations in which the Church and the State were one.

  • Austin, Texas ~ Texas Muslim Day<br />
<br />
“I love the knuckleheads,” said CAIR-TX’s executive director, Mustafaa Carroll of Houston. “In fact, I want to thank them publicly for being here, because they help you guys (reporters) get here. So they’re helping us. We want our children to see what’s going on in this world. We want our community to see.”<br />
<br />
http://www.mystatesman.com/news/news/state-regional-govt-politics/protesters-disrupt-rally-at-capitol-by-muslims-sup/njzNM/?ecmp=statesman_social_facebook_2014_sfp#5bc68b30.3581740.735627<br />
<br />
(Not reported in any story of note is that his remark was in response to a leading question  by the male reporter in the images who first used the "knucklehead" pejorative - this photographer hearing the question and being astounded at such a striking display of media bias and journalistic non-integrity.<br />
<br />
The citizens to whom the speaker was so pejoratively referring are those, who in their own way, are trying to sound the alarm about what many consider to be a creeping infiltration into the United States of,  not a religion as Westerners think of religion (as being separate form the machinery of the State), but as foreign political system wrapped up in a cloak of religion ( or vice versa).<br />
<br />
They feel that such amalgamation is antithetical to the political structure of the United States and is a and  a clear and present danger to the US Political Compact.  Indeed, they feel Islam, in its wrapping of political and religious in one entity, it is in contradiction to one of the principles apparent in the history of the creation of the United States, which is stands on the proposition and implementation of a system of separation of Church and State that the Founders knew very well lead to destruction of Nations in which the Church and the State were one.

  • Austin, Texas ~ Texas Muslim Day<br />
<br />
“I love the knuckleheads,” said CAIR-TX’s executive director, Mustafaa Carroll of Houston. “In fact, I want to thank them publicly for being here, because they help you guys (reporters) get here. So they’re helping us. We want our children to see what’s going on in this world. We want our community to see.”<br />
<br />
Not reported in any story of note is that his remark was in response to a leading question  by the male reporter in the image (center) who first used the "knucklehead" pejorative - this photographer hearing the question and being astounded at such a striking display of media bias and journalistic non-integrity.<br />
<br />
The citizens to whom the speaker was so pejoratively referring are those, who in their own way, are trying to sound the alarm about what many consider to be a creeping infiltration into the United States, of,  not a religion as Westerners think of religion (as being separate from the machinery of the State), but as a foreign political system wrapped up in a cloak of religion ( or vice versa).<br />
<br />
They feel that such amalgamation is antithetical to the political structure of the United States and is a clear and present danger to the US Political Compact.  Indeed, they feel Islam, in its wrapping of political and religious in one entity, is in contradiction to one of the principles apparent in the history of the creation of the United States, which stands on the proposition and implementation of a system of deliberate separation of Church and State. The Founders had learned from historical precedent that amalgamation of  Church and State leads to destruction of Nations in which the Church and the State were one.<br />
<br />
As for the reporter to image left, and contrary to the male reporter, (and the female  reporter (center) in a different exchange), her questions appeared tight and proper, eliciting information with no overtone of sensationalism, or trying to get "red meat" for a story.

  • Austin, Texas ~ Texas Muslim Day<br />
<br />
“I love the knuckleheads,” said CAIR-TX’s executive director, Mustafaa Carroll of Houston. “In fact, I want to thank them publicly for being here, because they help you guys (reporters) get here. So they’re helping us. We want our children to see what’s going on in this world. We want our community to see.”<br />
<br />
Not reported in any story of note is that his remark was in response to a leading question  by the male reporter in the image (center) who first used the "knucklehead" pejorative - this photographer hearing the question and being astounded at such a striking display of media bias and journalistic non-integrity.<br />
<br />
The citizens to whom the speaker was so pejoratively referring are those, who in their own way, are trying to sound the alarm about what many consider to be a creeping infiltration into the United States, of,  not a religion as Westerners think of religion (as being separate from the machinery of the State), but as a foreign political system wrapped up in a cloak of religion ( or vice versa).<br />
<br />
They feel that such amalgamation is antithetical to the political structure of the United States and is a clear and present danger to the US Political Compact.  Indeed, they feel Islam, in its wrapping of political and religious in one entity, is in contradiction to one of the principles apparent in the history of the creation of the United States, which stands on the proposition and implementation of a system of deliberate separation of Church and State. They point out that the  Founders had learned from historical precedent, that amalgamation of  Church and State leads to destruction of Nations.<br />
<br />
Also in the image is another reporter (female, center) who, while this photographer was standing adjacent,  approached a group of citizens voicing their opinions, and asked if they were Jewish and what group they were with. After the citizens said they were with no group, and they were not Jewish, but Christians,

  • Austin, Texas ~ Texas Muslim Day<br />
<br />
“I love the knuckleheads,” said CAIR-TX’s executive director, Mustafaa Carroll of Houston. “In fact, I want to thank them publicly for being here, because they help you guys (reporters) get here. So they’re helping us. We want our children to see what’s going on in this world. We want our community to see.”<br />
<br />
http://www.mystatesman.com/news/news/state-regional-govt-politics/protesters-disrupt-rally-at-capitol-by-muslims-sup/njzNM/?ecmp=statesman_social_facebook_2014_sfp#5bc68b30.3581740.735627<br />
<br />
(Not reported in any story of note is that his remark was in response to a leading question  by the male reporter in the images who first used the "knucklehead" pejorative - this photographer hearing the question and being astounded at such a striking display of media bias and journalistic non-integrity.<br />
<br />
The citizens to whom the speaker was so pejoratively referring are those, who in their own way, are trying to sound the alarm about what many consider to be a creeping infiltration into the United States of,  not a religion as Westerners think of religion (as being separate form the machinery of the State), but as foreign political system wrapped up in a cloak of religion ( or vice versa).<br />
<br />
They feel that such amalgamation is antithetical to the political structure of the United States and is a and  a clear and present danger to the US Political Compact.  Indeed, they feel Islam, in its wrapping of political and religious in one entity, it is in contradiction to one of the principles apparent in the history of the creation of the United States, which is stands on the proposition and implementation of a system of separation of Church and State that the Founders knew very well lead to destruction of Nations in which the Church and the State were one.

  • Austin, Texas ~ Texas Muslim Day<br />
<br />
“I love the knuckleheads,” said CAIR-TX’s executive director, Mustafaa Carroll of Houston. “In fact, I want to thank them publicly for being here, because they help you guys (reporters) get here. So they’re helping us. We want our children to see what’s going on in this world. We want our community to see.”<br />
<br />
http://www.mystatesman.com/news/news/state-regional-govt-politics/protesters-disrupt-rally-at-capitol-by-muslims-sup/njzNM/?ecmp=statesman_social_facebook_2014_sfp#5bc68b30.3581740.735627<br />
<br />
(Not reported in any story of note is that his remark was in response to a leading question  by the male reporter in the images who first used the "knucklehead" pejorative - this photographer hearing the question and being astounded at such a striking display of media bias and journalistic non-integrity.<br />
<br />
The citizens to whom the speaker was so pejoratively referring are those, who in their own way, are trying to sound the alarm about what many consider to be a creeping infiltration into the United States of,  not a religion as Westerners think of religion (as being separate form the machinery of the State), but as foreign political system wrapped up in a cloak of religion ( or vice versa).<br />
<br />
They feel that such amalgamation is antithetical to the political structure of the United States and is a and  a clear and present danger to the US Political Compact.  Indeed, they feel Islam, in its wrapping of political and religious in one entity, it is in contradiction to one of the principles apparent in the history of the creation of the United States, which is stands on the proposition and implementation of a system of separation of Church and State that the Founders knew very well lead to destruction of Nations in which the Church and the State were one.

  • Austin, Texas ~ Texas Muslim Day<br />
<br />
“I love the knuckleheads,” said CAIR-TX’s executive director, Mustafaa Carroll of Houston. “In fact, I want to thank them publicly for being here, because they help you guys (reporters) get here. So they’re helping us. We want our children to see what’s going on in this world. We want our community to see.”<br />
<br />
http://www.mystatesman.com/news/news/state-regional-govt-politics/protesters-disrupt-rally-at-capitol-by-muslims-sup/njzNM/?ecmp=statesman_social_facebook_2014_sfp#5bc68b30.3581740.735627<br />
<br />
(Not reported in any story of note is that his remark was in response to a leading question  by the male reporter in the images who first used the "knucklehead" pejorative - this photographer hearing the question and being astounded at such a striking display of media bias and journalistic non-integrity.<br />
<br />
The citizens to whom the speaker was so pejoratively referring are those, who in their own way, are trying to sound the alarm about what many consider to be a creeping infiltration into the United States of,  not a religion as Westerners think of religion (as being separate form the machinery of the State), but as foreign political system wrapped up in a cloak of religion ( or vice versa).<br />
<br />
They feel that such amalgamation is antithetical to the political structure of the United States and is a and  a clear and present danger to the US Political Compact.  Indeed, they feel Islam, in its wrapping of political and religious in one entity, it is in contradiction to one of the principles apparent in the history of the creation of the United States, which is stands on the proposition and implementation of a system of separation of Church and State that the Founders knew very well lead to destruction of Nations in which the Church and the State were one.

  • Austin, Texas ~ Texas Muslim Day<br />
<br />
“I love the knuckleheads,” said CAIR-TX’s executive director, Mustafaa Carroll of Houston. “In fact, I want to thank them publicly for being here, because they help you guys (reporters) get here. So they’re helping us. We want our children to see what’s going on in this world. We want our community to see.”<br />
<br />
http://www.mystatesman.com/news/news/state-regional-govt-politics/protesters-disrupt-rally-at-capitol-by-muslims-sup/njzNM/?ecmp=statesman_social_facebook_2014_sfp#5bc68b30.3581740.735627<br />
<br />
(Not reported in any story of note is that his remark was in response to a leading question  by the male reporter in the images who first used the "knucklehead" pejorative - this photographer hearing the question and being astounded at such a striking display of media bias and journalistic non-integrity.<br />
<br />
The citizens to whom the speaker was so pejoratively referring are those, who in their own way, are trying to sound the alarm about what many consider to be a creeping infiltration into the United States of,  not a religion as Westerners think of religion (as being separate form the machinery of the State), but as foreign political system wrapped up in a cloak of religion ( or vice versa).<br />
<br />
They feel that such amalgamation is antithetical to the political structure of the United States and is a and  a clear and present danger to the US Political Compact.  Indeed, they feel Islam, in its wrapping of political and religious in one entity, it is in contradiction to one of the principles apparent in the history of the creation of the United States, which is stands on the proposition and implementation of a system of separation of Church and State that the Founders knew very well lead to destruction of Nations in which the Church and the State were one.

  • Austin, Texas ~ Texas Muslim Day<br />
<br />
“I love the knuckleheads,” said CAIR-TX’s executive director, Mustafaa Carroll of Houston. “In fact, I want to thank them publicly for being here, because they help you guys (reporters) get here. So they’re helping us. We want our children to see what’s going on in this world. We want our community to see.”<br />
<br />
http://www.mystatesman.com/news/news/state-regional-govt-politics/protesters-disrupt-rally-at-capitol-by-muslims-sup/njzNM/?ecmp=statesman_social_facebook_2014_sfp#5bc68b30.3581740.735627<br />
<br />
(Not reported in any story of note is that his remark was in response to a leading question  by the male reporter in the images who first used the "knucklehead" pejorative - this photographer hearing the question and being astounded at such a striking display of media bias and journalistic non-integrity.<br />
<br />
The citizens to whom the speaker was so pejoratively referring are those, who in their own way, are trying to sound the alarm about what many consider to be a creeping infiltration into the United States of,  not a religion as Westerners think of religion (as being separate form the machinery of the State), but as foreign political system wrapped up in a cloak of religion ( or vice versa).<br />
<br />
They feel that such amalgamation is antithetical to the political structure of the United States and is a and  a clear and present danger to the US Political Compact.  Indeed, they feel Islam, in its wrapping of political and religious in one entity, it is in contradiction to one of the principles apparent in the history of the creation of the United States, which is stands on the proposition and implementation of a system of separation of Church and State that the Founders knew very well lead to destruction of Nations in which the Church and the State were one.

  • Austin, Texas ~ Texas Muslim Day<br />
<br />
“I love the knuckleheads,” said CAIR-TX’s executive director, Mustafaa Carroll of Houston. “In fact, I want to thank them publicly for being here, because they help you guys (reporters) get here. So they’re helping us. We want our children to see what’s going on in this world. We want our community to see.”<br />
<br />
http://www.mystatesman.com/news/news/state-regional-govt-politics/protesters-disrupt-rally-at-capitol-by-muslims-sup/njzNM/?ecmp=statesman_social_facebook_2014_sfp#5bc68b30.3581740.735627<br />
<br />
(Not reported in any story of note is that his remark was in response to a leading question  by the male reporter in the images who first used the "knucklehead" pejorative - this photographer hearing the question and being astounded at such a striking display of media bias and journalistic non-integrity.<br />
<br />
The citizens to whom the speaker was so pejoratively referring are those, who in their own way, are trying to sound the alarm about what many consider to be a creeping infiltration into the United States of,  not a religion as Westerners think of religion (as being separate form the machinery of the State), but as foreign political system wrapped up in a cloak of religion ( or vice versa).<br />
<br />
They feel that such amalgamation is antithetical to the political structure of the United States and is a and  a clear and present danger to the US Political Compact.  Indeed, they feel Islam, in its wrapping of political and religious in one entity, it is in contradiction to one of the principles apparent in the history of the creation of the United States, which is stands on the proposition and implementation of a system of separation of Church and State that the Founders knew very well lead to destruction of Nations in which the Church and the State were one.

  • Austin, Texas ~ Texas Muslim Day<br />
<br />
“I love the knuckleheads,” said CAIR-TX’s executive director, Mustafaa Carroll of Houston. “In fact, I want to thank them publicly for being here, because they help you guys (reporters) get here. So they’re helping us. We want our children to see what’s going on in this world. We want our community to see.”<br />
<br />
http://www.mystatesman.com/news/news/state-regional-govt-politics/protesters-disrupt-rally-at-capitol-by-muslims-sup/njzNM/?ecmp=statesman_social_facebook_2014_sfp#5bc68b30.3581740.735627<br />
<br />
(Not reported in any story of note is that his remark was in response to a leading question  by the male reporter in the images who first used the "knucklehead" pejorative - this photographer hearing the question and being astounded at such a striking display of media bias and journalistic non-integrity.<br />
<br />
The citizens to whom the speaker was so pejoratively referring are those, who in their own way, are trying to sound the alarm about what many consider to be a creeping infiltration into the United States of,  not a religion as Westerners think of religion (as being separate form the machinery of the State), but as foreign political system wrapped up in a cloak of religion ( or vice versa).<br />
<br />
They feel that such amalgamation is antithetical to the political structure of the United States and is a and  a clear and present danger to the US Political Compact.  Indeed, they feel Islam, in its wrapping of political and religious in one entity, it is in contradiction to one of the principles apparent in the history of the creation of the United States, which is stands on the proposition and implementation of a system of separation of Church and State that the Founders knew very well lead to destruction of Nations in which the Church and the State were one.

  • Austin, Texas ~ Texas Muslim Day<br />
<br />
“I love the knuckleheads,” said CAIR-TX’s executive director, Mustafaa Carroll of Houston. “In fact, I want to thank them publicly for being here, because they help you guys (reporters) get here. So they’re helping us. We want our children to see what’s going on in this world. We want our community to see.”<br />
<br />
http://www.mystatesman.com/news/news/state-regional-govt-politics/protesters-disrupt-rally-at-capitol-by-muslims-sup/njzNM/?ecmp=statesman_social_facebook_2014_sfp#5bc68b30.3581740.735627<br />
<br />
(Not reported in any story of note is that his remark was in response to a leading question  by the male reporter in the images who first used the "knucklehead" pejorative - this photographer hearing the question and being astounded at such a striking display of media bias and journalistic non-integrity.<br />
<br />
The citizens to whom the speaker was so pejoratively referring are those, who in their own way, are trying to sound the alarm about what many consider to be a creeping infiltration into the United States of,  not a religion as Westerners think of religion (as being separate form the machinery of the State), but as foreign political system wrapped up in a cloak of religion ( or vice versa).<br />
<br />
They feel that such amalgamation is antithetical to the political structure of the United States and is a and  a clear and present danger to the US Political Compact.  Indeed, they feel Islam, in its wrapping of political and religious in one entity, it is in contradiction to one of the principles apparent in the history of the creation of the United States, which is stands on the proposition and implementation of a system of separation of Church and State that the Founders knew very well lead to destruction of Nations in which the Church and the State were one.

  • Austin, Texas ~ Texas Muslim Day<br />
<br />
“I love the knuckleheads,” said CAIR-TX’s executive director, Mustafaa Carroll of Houston. “In fact, I want to thank them publicly for being here, because they help you guys (reporters) get here. So they’re helping us. We want our children to see what’s going on in this world. We want our community to see.”<br />
<br />
Not reported in any story of note is that his remark was in response to a leading question  by the male reporter in the images who first used the "knucklehead" pejorative - this photographer hearing the question and being astounded at such a striking display of media bias and journalistic non-integrity.<br />
<br />
The citizens to whom the speaker was so pejoratively referring are those, who in their own way, are trying to sound the alarm about what many consider to be a creeping infiltration into the United States, of,  not a religion as Westerners think of religion (as being separate from the machinery of the State), but as a foreign political system wrapped up in a cloak of religion ( or vice versa).<br />
<br />
They feel that such amalgamation is antithetical to the political structure of the United States and is a clear and present danger to the US Political Compact.  Indeed, they feel Islam, in its wrapping of political and religious in one entity, is in contradiction to one of the principles apparent in the history of the creation of the United States, which stands on the proposition and implementation of a system of deliberate separation of Church and State. The Founders had learned from historical precedent that amalgamation of  Church and State leads to destruction of Nations in which the Church and the State were one.<br />
<br />
As for the reporter to image left, and contrary to the male reporter,(and the female  reporter (center) in a different exchange), her questions appeared tight and proper, eliciting information with no overtone of sensationalism, or trying to get "red meat" for a story.